¤K¤Q¤­¾Ç¦~«×
¬Fªv¾Ç

¤@¡N¸Õ½×¥Á¥D¬Fªv¤§Àu¯ÊÂI¡C
¤G¡N¸Õ½×¡u²{¹ê¥D¸q¡v(realism)¥H¤Î¨ä¤Ï½×(antithesis)¤§°²³]¤Î¯SÂI¡M¨Ã½×²{¹ê¥D
    ¸q»P¡uÅv¤O§¡¿Å¡v(balance of power)ªºÃö«Y¡C
¤T¡N¦ó¿×¡u²z½×¬Fªv¡v¡H¦ó¿×¡u¹ê»Ú¬Fªv¡v¡H¬Fªv¾Ç¬O¬ã¨s¡u²z½×¬Fªv¡v§í©Î¡u¹ê
    »Ú¬Fªv¡v¡H¤S¬ã¨s¬Fªv¾Çªº·N¸q¦ó¦b¡H
¥|¡N½Ķ¨Ã»¡©ú¤U¦C¤å¥y¡G
    In short¡Mif democratic life involves no more than a periodic vote¡M
    citizens' activities will be largely confined to the 'private' realm
    of civil society and the scope of their actions will depend largely
    on the resources they can command. Few opportunities will exist for
    citizens to act as citizens; that is¡Mas participants in public life.
    But if democracy is understood as a double-sided process¡Mthis state
    of affairs might be redressed by creating opportunities for people
    to establish themselves 'in their capacity of being citizens'. The
    'active citizen' could once again return to the centre of public life¡
    ¡Minvolving him-or herself in the realms of both state and civil
    society. Of course¡Mthe nature of this involvement would differ in
    each of these realms¡Maccording to its organizational and
    institutional eatures. But opportunities will at least have been
    created for all those affected by the decision-making structures
    of their communities to participate in the latters' regulation
    or so the story of democracy has so far suggested. However¡M
    democracy has another side.